Introduction by Mike Lazaridis
A quarter century ago, a Senate Special Committee
published a report entitled, A Science Policy for
Canada. The report was the culmination of an
exhaustive inquiry that included testimony from more
than 1,000 scientists and research administrators. The
committee concluded: "For the first time in our
economic history, we must become an innovative nation."
What was an insightful and prescient truth in 1973 is
an urgent call to action in the 21st century.
Today, the use of innovations based on advanced
technology is so ubiquitous that we often take it for
granted. However, we must never forget the engine
responsible for computers, airplanes, microwave ovens
and even espresso machines. These products would not be
possible without the application of decades of
scientific research.
Canada has certainly produced a number of world-class
scientific innovations over the last 25 years, but much
needs to be done to secure a robust culture and
infrastructure for the long haul. We are in the midst
of an unprecedented restructuring of the world economy,
where wealth is increasingly created from the
application of knowledge. In the 21st century, Canada's
prosperity will flow from innovative new products and
services in industries such as transportation,
telecommunications, power generation, aerospace, and
medicine.
Seeing this future, the Government of Ontario began to
actively foster the creation of a knowledge economy
driven by research and innovation. Along with other
important initiatives, the Ontario Innovation Trust was
created to provide funding that scientists and
researchers needed to create laboratories with the best
available equipment and supplies. The Trust was
motivated in part by a demonstrable loss of critical
talent in important fields to the United States.
Another impetus for the OIT was a change in policy of
the federal government and its establishment of the
Canada Foundation for Innovation. After years of
Canadian scientists living in a technological
poorhouse, trying to cadge time on machines in other
countries, Ottawa set up a $3.2 billion fund to
refurbish Canadian laboratories. The CFI initiative,
however, required funding from multiple sources. CFI
could provide 40 per cent of eligible project costs.
The provinces were challenged to contribute another 40
per cent while the remainder had to come from other
sources.
In 1999, Queen's Park allotted $750 million to the OIT
to be allocated for physical research infrastructure
and the purchase of new research equipment. From its
inception, OIT was not just a source of money for the
equipment to help scientists and researchers explore
worthy ideas. OIT-supported projects also had to
demonstrate the possibility of practical application,
of improving the province's capacity for innovation, of
stimulating economic growth and better health and
environmental quality. Training and retention of
personnel were also imperative. OIT sought to promote
partnerships and sharing, and its projects had to open
up the way to collaboration with the private
sector.
Those were the explicit purposes of the OIT, but they
suggest a number of responsibilities we all share.
First and foremost, we must provide all of our young
people with the opportunity to receive as much
education as possible. To this end, we must have strong
and well-funded universities and colleges. We must also
foster a culture of scientific excellence and
entrepreneurship - a sense that making new businesses
from research findings is critical to our future.
OIT helped foster such a culture in meaningful,
concrete ways. That is perhaps its most enduring
legacy.
